🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.